The right software to manage your site's security? Benchmark 2025
The security of your site is a priority that must not be neglected. Numerous solutions are available to support your teams, from the simplest to the most complex tasks, to guarantee lasting, enhanced protection for your facilities.
Faced with the multitude of sites and applications offering this type of service, we have drawn up a comparison of the most popular solutions on the market: Trackforce, Sekur, Jaguards... This study enables us to present you with their strong points, their limitations, as well as existing alternatives to avoid their disadvantages.Here is our objective comparison for the year 2025 of handrail solutions for site security.
Trackforce: an all-in-one solution that moves away from effective site protection
Benefits of Trackforce
Trackforce provides:
- Real-time dynamic mapping of security personnel
- Comprehensive dashboard
- Task allocation for security teams
Limitations of the tool:
- No real-time traceability of incidents
- Limited inter- and intra-team communication
- No SMS or e-mail alert in the event of an incident.
Trackforce may appeal with its modern (if somewhat busy) interface, but in addition to a handrail solution for security, it requires an internal communications network to complement their tool, which does not integrate live communications.
Sekur: a complete solution with no specific focus on safety
Although versatile and customizable, this solution doesn't put safety first.
The positive points of Sekur
Sekur provides:
- A solution that can be easily modified and adapted to your needs
- Real-time geolocation of your agents, with alerts in the event of problems or irregularities
- Precise rounds can be set up
The tool's limitations:
- No direct communication between security teams, only alerts in the event of a major problem
- No secure access or firewall required on important or sensitive files or elements of your site
- The application starts almost from scratch for each new customer, requiring time-consuming set-up.
Sekur has opted for simplicity that can be adapted to any environment. But, like Trackforce, the solution requires an additional communication channel to ensure site protection by the teams.
Otherwise, the handrail solution it offers is rather complete, if not a little too complete, since it also includes an HR and Supply Chain component. This may suit some companies that also require this type of solution, but it often creates an overflow: most companies looking for an IT handrail solution to secure their site are not looking to replace or supplement their HR or Supply Chain departments.
Jaguards: a solution more focused on cyber than hardware
Unlike other solutions that are more focused on the field and operational management, Jaguards stands out for its approach to the cyber dimension and the flow of information.
The positive points of Jaguards
Jaguards provides:
- Increased communication of information, even allowing PDFs to be sent to law enforcement agencies or the media
- Feedback to help you improve the tool while it is being implemented on your premises.
The tool's limitations:
- No predefined rounds, but employees can geolocate themselves
- A very unintuitive interface, lacking in clarity and which can confuse some users
- A definite lack of protection for important data, which can be shared too easily.
Jaguards is best viewed as a complete solution that also covers your site's cyber security. The electronic handrail is a supplement to an already complete application, and not necessarily adapted to what is expected of a real electronic handrail for securing a site.
Feature comparison table
To make things clearer, here's a simplified table listing the major features that security teams need most. Each tool is assigned a ❌ or ✅ depending on whether or not the functionality is present in their solution.
| Functionality | Trackforce | Sekur | Jaguards | Hamilton Security |
| Incident reporting | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ |
| Real-time incident tracking | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ |
| Communication between teams | ❌ | ❌ | ✅ | ✅ |
| Pre-definable round | ✅ | ✅ | ❌ | ✅ |
| Incident photos in reporting | ❌ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ |
| Intuitive dashboard | ✅ | ✅ | ❌ | ✅ |
| Immediate alert (SMS or e-mail) | ❌ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ |
| Multisupport | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ |
| Secure access for more important documents | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ | ✅ |
| Secure access | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ |
| Made-to-measure customization | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ |
| Centralized reporting | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ |
Conclusion:
This range of solutions shows that each vendor provides the functionalities it considers most appropriate. As a result, some vendors find themselves somewhat outside the scope of a Security Director's expectations when it comes to choosing an electronic handrail, while others specialize too much in a single area.
To reconcile all this, just look at the table above, which highlights the main concerns of Security Managers for the electronic handrail solution they'd like to have in their hands. The only one of the four applications that ticks them all is the one we haven't yet featured, which is a clever synthesis of the other three.
According to the same table, Hamilton Security is the only application that best meets market demands and is most worth trying.